I would like to raise a serious complaint regarding an incident involving a user who has been provoking me on a daily basis.
Today, that user crossed all limits by abusing me through both a guest ID and a registered ID. The abuse even extended to my family. Despite this unacceptable behaviour, the admin initially took no action against him.
When I finally started responding to his provocation, the admin decided to ban both of us. However, my ban was for two days, and he was unbanned only today. I would like to understand why both users were treated differently, especially when the other person was the one who initiated the abuse.
I accept that I should not have engaged in the argument, but I did not use any abusive or inappropriate language. On the other hand, the other user openly abused me and even dragged my family into the matter.
My questions to the administration are:
Furthermore, the same person has already faced action against his Forum ID and Zozo account for abusing a female admin as well. Despite this, Harman26 appears to be protecting him. This raises serious concerns about favouritism and the impartiality of the administration.
I am not denying my own mistake of responding to the provocation. However, I strongly believe that the person who initiated the abuse and crossed personal boundaries should also face appropriate consequences.
I request the administration to investigate this matter fairly, review the complete conversation and chat records, and take appropriate action against the person responsible.
Admins are expected to treat every user equally, regardless of personal relationships or preferences. Rules should apply equally to everyone, not selectively.
This kind of partiality is disappointing and completely unfair to genuine users like us. I hope the administration takes this complaint seriously and ensures that such incidents are not repeated.
Thank you for your attention.
Today, that user crossed all limits by abusing me through both a guest ID and a registered ID. The abuse even extended to my family. Despite this unacceptable behaviour, the admin initially took no action against him.
When I finally started responding to his provocation, the admin decided to ban both of us. However, my ban was for two days, and he was unbanned only today. I would like to understand why both users were treated differently, especially when the other person was the one who initiated the abuse.
I accept that I should not have engaged in the argument, but I did not use any abusive or inappropriate language. On the other hand, the other user openly abused me and even dragged my family into the matter.
My questions to the administration are:
- Why was no immediate action taken when the other user was abusing me?
- If both users were involved in the argument, shouldn't the punishment have been fair and equal?
- Why should a user who initiates abuse and targets someone's family receive different treatment?
- Does the administration follow the same rules for everyone, or does it depend on personal relationships?
Furthermore, the same person has already faced action against his Forum ID and Zozo account for abusing a female admin as well. Despite this, Harman26 appears to be protecting him. This raises serious concerns about favouritism and the impartiality of the administration.
I am not denying my own mistake of responding to the provocation. However, I strongly believe that the person who initiated the abuse and crossed personal boundaries should also face appropriate consequences.
I request the administration to investigate this matter fairly, review the complete conversation and chat records, and take appropriate action against the person responsible.
Admins are expected to treat every user equally, regardless of personal relationships or preferences. Rules should apply equally to everyone, not selectively.
This kind of partiality is disappointing and completely unfair to genuine users like us. I hope the administration takes this complaint seriously and ensures that such incidents are not repeated.
Thank you for your attention.
Last edited:
