Akshayakki
Wellknown Ace
An examination of authority, accountability, and the limits of power begins!
I am writing to express my deep disgust and profound frustration at what appears to be a deeply intimidating and inappropriate exercise of authority.
The persistent banning of my account from this platform ,particularly when repeated bans or kicks appear to have been imposed without clear ,transparent or satisfactory justification has left me deeply concerned and disturbed.
What is even worse is the manner in which the authorities have exercised their control - leaving users feeling intimidated ,unheard , and powerless to seek a meaningful explanation or appeal.
Yesterday, after I posted a meme related to Mahatma Gandhi, I was removed from the room by either an admin or a moderator, which still remains mystery. After returning to the room, I discussed whether Gandhiji should be perceived as a politician or a spiritual leader as we have always been taught to see him as a freedom fighter .
I was banned again. In the meanwhile, I tried numerous ways to communicate with the moderator and others to understand what actions of mine led to another unreasonable ban. I did not receive any formal information, and all my efforts to realize what nature of content should or shouldn't be posted were futile.
Today, while discussing public personalities on the wall, I mentioned Pawan Kalyan, Chiranjeevi, and Balakrishna. These individuals are not only associated with politics; they are also well-known actors and public figures, with careers and public identities extending beyond politics. My discussion was about whether mentioning or posting pictures of such public figures could also lead to a ban, particularly when they can be discussed in both their entertainment and public/political contexts.
I absolutely agree that account moderation is undoubtedly necessary ,but authority comes the responsibility to act fairly, transparently and proportionately.
Being a long-term user and badge-holder, I abide by the rules and regulations of Zozo and I haven't involved in any kind of abuse in my 7 years of stay here.
However, the repeated bans and kicks on my id without providing a clear explanation or a genuine opportunity to seek the reason behind such harsh actions is forcing me to raise concerns about accountability and the misuse of administrative power.
It would be greatly appreciated if the higher authorities understand that this is not simply about losing access to an account. it is about upholding the fundamental principle of being treated fairly and being given a reasonable explanation when decision significantly affects one's participation on a platform, which has always been central to Zozo's management since the day I registered here seven years ago.
There is also a larger question that cannot be overloaded: if a user with seven years of experience here can find themselves facing such treatment, what protection, recourse, or voice does a new user have when confronted with a similar situation?
Therefore, I firmly believe that this deserves as open public conversation - not silence; thoughtful scrutiny - not dismissal; and accountability - not unchecked discretion. I invite everyone who has witnessed, experienced, or reflected on such conduct to speak openly and respectfully.
Because when authority crosses its boundaries, accountability must draw the line.
Because what happens to one user today can quietly become the precedent for everyone who follows tomorrow. Let the discussion begin. Let responsible action follows.
I am writing to express my deep disgust and profound frustration at what appears to be a deeply intimidating and inappropriate exercise of authority.
The persistent banning of my account from this platform ,particularly when repeated bans or kicks appear to have been imposed without clear ,transparent or satisfactory justification has left me deeply concerned and disturbed.
What is even worse is the manner in which the authorities have exercised their control - leaving users feeling intimidated ,unheard , and powerless to seek a meaningful explanation or appeal.
Yesterday, after I posted a meme related to Mahatma Gandhi, I was removed from the room by either an admin or a moderator, which still remains mystery. After returning to the room, I discussed whether Gandhiji should be perceived as a politician or a spiritual leader as we have always been taught to see him as a freedom fighter .
I was banned again. In the meanwhile, I tried numerous ways to communicate with the moderator and others to understand what actions of mine led to another unreasonable ban. I did not receive any formal information, and all my efforts to realize what nature of content should or shouldn't be posted were futile.
Today, while discussing public personalities on the wall, I mentioned Pawan Kalyan, Chiranjeevi, and Balakrishna. These individuals are not only associated with politics; they are also well-known actors and public figures, with careers and public identities extending beyond politics. My discussion was about whether mentioning or posting pictures of such public figures could also lead to a ban, particularly when they can be discussed in both their entertainment and public/political contexts.
I absolutely agree that account moderation is undoubtedly necessary ,but authority comes the responsibility to act fairly, transparently and proportionately.
Being a long-term user and badge-holder, I abide by the rules and regulations of Zozo and I haven't involved in any kind of abuse in my 7 years of stay here.
However, the repeated bans and kicks on my id without providing a clear explanation or a genuine opportunity to seek the reason behind such harsh actions is forcing me to raise concerns about accountability and the misuse of administrative power.
It would be greatly appreciated if the higher authorities understand that this is not simply about losing access to an account. it is about upholding the fundamental principle of being treated fairly and being given a reasonable explanation when decision significantly affects one's participation on a platform, which has always been central to Zozo's management since the day I registered here seven years ago.
There is also a larger question that cannot be overloaded: if a user with seven years of experience here can find themselves facing such treatment, what protection, recourse, or voice does a new user have when confronted with a similar situation?
Therefore, I firmly believe that this deserves as open public conversation - not silence; thoughtful scrutiny - not dismissal; and accountability - not unchecked discretion. I invite everyone who has witnessed, experienced, or reflected on such conduct to speak openly and respectfully.
Because when authority crosses its boundaries, accountability must draw the line.
Because what happens to one user today can quietly become the precedent for everyone who follows tomorrow. Let the discussion begin. Let responsible action follows.
