• We kindly request chatzozo forum members to follow forum rules to avoid getting a temporary suspension. Do not use non-English languages in the International Sex Chat Discussion section. This section is mainly created for everyone who uses English as their communication language.

Whts your opinion on today's high court order

Jack_v2 said:
The court said: “The mere sight of the naked upper body of the woman should not be deemed to be sexual by default. So also, depiction of the naked body of a woman cannot per se be termed to be obscene, indecent or sexually explicit.

Uff court superb :clapping:
Click to expand...
On this note, the guy who was "allegedly" masturbating in the public bus should also not be considered as indecent or sexually explicit
 
Jack_v2 said:
The court said: “The mere sight of the naked upper body of the woman should not be deemed to be sexual by default. So also, depiction of the naked body of a woman cannot per se be termed to be obscene, indecent or sexually explicit.

Uff court superb :clapping:
Click to expand...
Can't even imagine this is the state which fought for covering women's chest area (Chaliyar agitation) back in the 80s
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top