कुछ शायरी, कुछ सवाल — इश्क़, रिश्ते और ज़िंदगी
- Thread starter Satya
- Start date
बहुत कठिन प्रश्न
मानव इतना निस्वार्थ भी कहाँ हैं
भगवान हो के भी राधा ने प्रेम और मोहको समजने में वक़्त लगा था
हम तो एक साधारण मनुष्य हैं मोह को प्रेम मान के जिते हे तो दुःख दुःख कि जिम्मेदार एक दुझे को ठानते हैं सायद, राधे राधे
So True, why can't there be love even with difference of opinion or likings...
Maybe there is lack of maturity and broad thinking... who knows whats the answer to this..
To live in Here and now is so simple that we cannot understand and follow it.
Life is spontaneous but we have become too dull to see that.
शायद बात यही है कि हम मोह को प्रेम और अपनी अपेक्षाओं को अपना अधिकार समझ बैठते हैं। जब दूसरा हमारी इच्छा के अनुसार नहीं चलता, तो हम अपने दुःख का कारण उसे मान लेते हैं।
लेकिन क्या प्रेम को समझने के लिए निस्वार्थ होना ज़रूरी है, या पहले यह देखना ज़रूरी है कि हम जिसे प्रेम कह रहे हैं, उसमें वास्तव में प्रेम कितना है और हमारी अपनी इच्छाएँ कितनी हैं?
शायद समझ की शुरुआत यहीं से होती है।
But is the problem really a lack of broad thinking, or is it that thinking comes before noticing?
Thinking, in the absence of noticing, is limited by what it already knows. It can rearrange, compare, and expand its existing ideas, but it cannot see beyond its own assumptions merely by thinking more.
Noticing comes first; thinking follows what is noticed. Without noticing, thinking interprets life through its existing limitations and mistakes that interpretation for understanding.
The point is not to think more broadly, but to notice before thinking begins to define what is being seen.
Not everything is an argument, sometimes its a feeling. You may call it noticing, observing. But a close relationship is not based on logic and intelligence.
I'm not saying everything is an argument, nor that feelings need to be explained through logic.
But why separate feeling from intelligence? A human being doesn't need to think logically before feeling or relating to another person. Life is already happening before thought begins to explain it.
The limitation begins when we mistake thinking about life for living life. Thought can describe a feeling as love, closeness, or attachment, but the description is not the actual feeling or relationship.
Intelligence is not merely thinking about what is happening; it is noticing what is happening before thought reduces it to its own interpretation.
“Close” and “open” are words. What is actually happening between two people is the reality to be noticed.
अच्छाई और बुराई
किसी ने अच्छा कहा, किसी ने बुरा कहा,हर किसी ने अपने नज़रिये से फ़ैसला किया।इंसान वही था, नज़रें बदलती रहीं,कहानियाँ बदलती रहीं, पहचानें बदलती रहीं।
एक की कहानी में कोई हीरो बन जाता है,दूसरे की कहानी में वही दोषी कहलाता है।
फ़ैसला सुनाने से पहले इतना तो सोचो,सच बदल गया, या सिर्फ़ देखने वाला बदल जाता है?
सुंदरता और दिखावा
चेहरे सँवारे, आईने सजाए,ख़ुद को बेहतर दिखाने के कितने रास्ते अपनाए।हर दिन एक नई कमी नज़र आई,सुंदर बनने की चाह में नई शर्त लगाई।
ख़ूबसूरती को एक रूप में बाँध दिया,फिर हर दूसरे रूप को कम आँक दिया।
जिस सुंदरता की कोई सीमा नहीं थी,उसे कुछ मापदंडों में क़ैद कर दिया।
Have you ever experienced it by yourself?
How do you know what is happening without a thought?
Good and evil are only interpretations according to time, place and person. There are no absolutes in it.
There will be always be lingering wishes, what if? There is no remedy to it..
Beauty lies in the eyes of beholder.
If one cannot see ownself as beautiful than there isn't much that can be done besides helping them see how valuable they are.
First, is an experience naturally “yours” or “mine,” or does thought claim it as personal? “Yourself” is a word; the word is not the actuality.
Take a simple example: you hear a bird singing. The sound is heard before you identify it as a bird or give it a name.
Similarly, a feeling can arise before you think about what it means or why it is happening.
Noticing is being aware of what is happening; knowing involves identifying or interpreting it. The experience itself is not the same as the explanation we give it.
So, why assume that thought must come first for something to be noticed?
TheWanderer
Wellknown Ace
What ifs ...
No assumptions at all.
Its a simple question, either yes or no.
What is your own experience?
Some questions may not be accurately answered with a simple yes or no without first clarifying what they mean.
You're asking about “my own experience.” But what does “own” mean here?
Take a simple example: a bell rings. You hear the sound. Then you identify it as a bell and say, “I heard a bell.”
The sound being heard is one thing; the thought “I heard a bell” is another. Thought identifies, names, and describes what happened, then claims it as “my experience.”
The experience is not the same as the thought about the experience. The word is not the actuality.
So, are you asking about the experience itself, or about the thought that claims it as “mine”?